Beta-blocker erases fear response related to bad memories
- Details
- Dimitris Xygalatas
- Monday, 16 February 2009
- Blog Dimitris Xygalatas' blog
In the cult movie “The Matrix”, Morpheus offers Neo a choice between 2 pills: Take the red pill, and you got yourself enough trouble to make a whole film trilogy. Take the blue pill, and forget we ever had this conversation”. Scientists at the University of Amsterdam think there might actually be something similar to the blue pill.

Animal studies have shown that memories involving fear can change when recalled, a process referred to as reconsolidation. In this study, published on the online edition of Nature Neuroscience,[1] Merel Kindt, Marieke Soeter and Bram Vervliet tried to disrupt the reactivation of fear memories in human subjects by administering propranolol pills (a beta-blocker normally used in the treatment of high blood pressure).
The study involved 60 volunteers, who first learned to associate spiders with fear by receiving mild electric shocks whenever pictures of spiders were shown to them. 24 hours later, subjects were randomly split into 2 groups. One group received the propranolol pills, the other a placebo. Then, they were shown the pictures of the spiders again, and their fear response was measured, based on their startle reflex as a reaction to a loud noise. Results showed that the startle response was significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the placebo group. The same effect was measured another 24 hours later, without any further administration of the drug. Thus, the administration of the drug before getting subjects to recall fear memories, erased the behavioural expression of the fear 24 hours later and prevented the return of the fear.Read more: Beta-blocker erases fear response related to bad memories
Presidential OCD ?
- Details
- Dimitris Xygalatas
- Thursday, 22 January 2009
- Blog Dimitris Xygalatas' blog
President Obama having to retake the presidential oath because a single word was out of sequence when he was sworn in last Tuesday, January 20, 2009, made me thing of the relation between ritual and Obsessive-Compulsive Behaviour (OCD), as suggested most notably by Pascal Boyer and Pierre Lienard (in "Why Ritualized Behavior? Precaution Systems and Action-Parsing in Developmental, Pathological and Cultural Rituals" Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2006) 29: 1-56 available here; see also a shorter paper of theirs here).

The White House counsel, Greg Craig, reassured the public that Obama's inauguration was effective and that he has indeed been president since inauguration day. However, he said, the repeat was motivated by "an abundance of caution". Which means... by obsessive-compulsive behaviour. Note that the misspoken sentence was 100% identical in meaning, but contained a single slight difference in word order. According to the US Constitution, the oath reads: "I will faithfully execute the office of president of the United States", while Obama said: "I will execute the office of president of the United States faithfully."
Ironically, some claim that even the second oath is not valid and that Obama is still not president, because he forgot to bring a Bible for the second oath. And although the Bible is not a legal requirement, the fact that it is traditionally used in presidential inaugurations makes it part of the ritual. And as ritual practitioners often tell anthropologists, a ritual must be performed accurately in order to be effective...


Another possible alternative explanation for IFT
What's wrong with "intentional stance"?
Possible alternative explanation for IFT
Crushing a dispute with a smile (ahem, a bared-teeth display)
Impartial intervention, or pragmatic intervention?
Not fairness, not mutual interest ... cognitive dissonance maybe
A couple of references
Emotions as regulators of social behavior
Women are not allowed by social group to own their bodies
"Rigtheous" women and "promiscuous" men