"Times Higher Ed", stop muddying the waters
- Details
- Michael Stewart
- Sunday, 30 November 2008
- Blog Michael's blog
I don’t want to turn myself into a blogger obsessed with sloppy scientific coverage in the media, but I feel someone ought to note, if only for the record, the absurd and misleading comments by Hannah Fearn in the British Times Higher Education Supplement – the trade journal of UK academics. In one of the lead articles in the 20th November issue she claims that ‘anthropology is at war with itself’ having “split firmly into two factions – social anthropologists and evolutionary anthropologists.” (See here).
Compared to the 1970’s when the AAA infamously debated (and defeated) a resolution denouncing EO Wilson’ s 1975 ‘Sociobiology’ textbook as "an attempt to justify genetically the sexist, racist and elitist status quo in human society,” signs of brutal conflict today are, in reality, conspicuous by their absence...
Your brain needs a British headmistress
- Details
- Michael Stewart
- Wednesday, 19 November 2008
- Blog Michael's blog
I was struck this week how easily work in the field of cognition and culture is acquired and transposed by others with strange agendas – as is always the case with an academic discipline that is making waves.

The Girls’ neural architecture will be well protected by Cheltenham Ladies' College educational architecture (Cheltenham Ladies' college in the 50s).
And while the field should make the most of its fifteen minutes of fame, there is a downside...


Another possible alternative explanation for IFT
What's wrong with "intentional stance"?
Possible alternative explanation for IFT
Crushing a dispute with a smile (ahem, a bared-teeth display)
Impartial intervention, or pragmatic intervention?
Not fairness, not mutual interest ... cognitive dissonance maybe
A couple of references
Emotions as regulators of social behavior
Women are not allowed by social group to own their bodies
"Rigtheous" women and "promiscuous" men