Latest comments

  • More on blue and pin...
    Nicolas Baumard More...
    Great post Ophelia! A very good topic for cognition and culture studies!

    As for the ... 2 hours ago
  • Brilliant!
    Lucy Fisher More...
    It\'s like when people say \"All you need is confidence\" or \"you\'ve got to have trus... 8 days ago
  • False Dichotomies
    Nicholas Smyth More...
    First: The idea of an unconscious mental realm as the source of our action and experien... 9 days ago
  • Fine print
    Olivier Morin More...
    Thank you very much, Young-Hoon Kim, for replying to Karen. I am glad to read from you ... 29 days ago
  • Wonderful Comments
    Young-Hoon Kim More...
    I really appreciate the comments by Karen Lofstrom. More of importance, I totally under... 29 days ago

Latest Blog Posts

Why pink? Color matters

Ophelia Deroy | 5/9/2010

Paul Rozin on what psychologists should study

Hugo Mercier | 28/7/2010

What if there had never been a Cognitive Revolution?

Nicolas Baumard | 22/7/2010

Paul the Octopus, relevance and the joy of superstition

Dan Sperber | 13/7/2010

Opacity tasting with Dan and Maurice

György Gergely | 11/7/2010

Homeopathy as witchcraft

Nicolas Baumard | 2/7/2010

The sacredness of God

Brian Malley | 27/6/2010

“Oy vey, have you got the wrong vampire!” A reply to Frans de Waal

Dan Sperber | 22/6/2010

Three Questions for Michael Tomasello

Emma Cohen | 20/6/2010

Why do acamedics oppose capitalism?

Nicolas Baumard | 14/6/2010

Communication, punishment and common pool resources

Hugo Mercier | 6/6/2010

Believing Maurice Bloch on doubting, doubting him on believing

Dan Sperber | 30/5/2010

Why do we make our tastes public?

Nicolas Baumard | 23/5/2010

Doubting among the Zafimaniry

Maurice Bloch | 16/5/2010

camphor - ammonia = anniseed x peppermint

Olivier Morin | 9/5/2010

Heaven before the space age

Brian Malley | 6/5/2010

Innocents fornicating and apes grieving

Dan Sperber | 4/5/2010

Is there a language instinct?

Nicolas Baumard | 1/5/2010

Endorsing evolution: A matter of authority?

Helen De Cruz | 27/4/2010

Are variations in economic games really caused by culture?

Nicolas Baumard | 23/4/2010

What explains the stability of animal culture?

Nicolas Claidière | 15/4/2010

On the Use of Natural Experiments in Anthropology

Nicolas Baumard | 5/4/2010

The social rationality of footballers

Hugo Mercier | 27/3/2010

Varieties of disbelief

Dan Sperber | 23/3/2010

Is the “problem of evil” universal?

Brian Malley | 18/3/2010

Cultural differences and linguistic justice

Nicolas Baumard | 15/3/2010

Pictures of the week: Globalized Prehistory in Arunachal Pradesh

Philippe Ramirez | 28/2/2010

Block and Kitcher review What Darwin Got Wrong by Fodor and Piatelli-Palmarini

Dan Sperber | 24/2/2010

Can you tell who will win the election in another society just by looking at the faces of the candidates?

Hugo Mercier | 22/2/2010

Religion science: if you pay the piper, do you call the tune?

Olivier Morin | 19/2/2010

Better live in Sweden than in the US: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better

Nicolas Baumard | 11/2/2010

There is no such thing as sexual intercourse

Pascal Boyer | 8/2/2010

Altruistic adoption in chimpanzees?

Nicolas Baumard | 3/2/2010

Experimental epidemiology: The work of Chip Heath

Hugo Mercier | 1/2/2010

Four recipes for religion

Harvey Whitehouse | 25/1/2010

Mad in America

Ophelia Deroy | 20/1/2010

Na'vi Cognition and Culture

Nicolas Baumard | 19/1/2010

Cognition under the high brow

Pascal Boyer | 14/1/2010

Cross potatoes

Brian Malley | 7/1/2010

Essentialist animals?

Helen De Cruz | 5/1/2010

Jingle Bell - Punjabi Tadka

Dan Sperber | 24/12/2009

Golden bell and Iron shirt

Brian Malley | 17/12/2009

Conversation Hackers

Olivier Morin | 12/12/2009

Three Questions for Simon Baron-Cohen

Emma Cohen | 8/12/2009

The scope of natural pedagogy theory (II): uniquely human?

Pierre Jacob | 6/12/2009

Can you tell the language of the mother from her baby's cry?

Nicolas Claidière | 2/12/2009

Death, where is thy sting ?

Pascal Boyer | 30/11/2009

The scope of natural pedagogy theory (I): babies

Pierre Jacob | 26/11/2009

Some like it hot

Ophelia Deroy | 25/11/2009

Language faculty? Semiotic system? Or what?

Dan Sperber | 22/11/2009

Changing Minds: Cultures and Cognition in Evolution
News - Call for Papers

EXTENDED DEADLINE - DATE DE SOUMISSION REPOUSSEE

Cognitio 2009 - Changing Minds: Cultures and Cognition in Evolution
Montreal, Canada
June 4th, 5th & 6th 2006.

http://cognitio.uqam.ca/2009
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

[version française ci-après]

Cognitio 2009 invites graduate students and young researchers in cognitive science, anthropology, biology, psychology, computer science, philosophy, or any discipline concerned with cognition, evolution, and culture to present their work at the conference.

Suggested topics include:

  • comparative psychology and animal cultures;
  • culture and cognition in cross-cultural perspective;
  • evolutionary psychology and the adapted mind;
  • cognitive neurosciences and cultural learning;
  • the modelisation of cultural evolution;
  • the evolution and origins of language;
  • the evolution of culture and cognition in the human lineage;
  • epistemological issues related to the study of cognition, evolution, and culture.

Submission of proposals for the conference is done through the EasyChair system (see http://cognitio.uqam.ca/2009). We are only asking for 600 words abstracts. EasyChair will allow you to upload a PDF paper if you want to, but only your abstract will be evaluated.

Deadline for submission IS NOW MARCH 13th

Keynote speakers:

* Joseph Henrich
Canada Research Chair in Culture, Cognition, and Evolution
University of British Columbia

* Frédéric Bouchard
Philosophy Department
University of Montreal

Theme:

Cognitive Science, which now includes disciplines such as cognitive genetics, evolutionary developmental neuroscience and cognitive anthropology, is unfolding a fresh view of the mind and its relation to culture, fresh yet strangely reminiscent of pre-20th century conceptions of the mind, from Plato to Freud. According to this view, much of cognition is done by unconscious automatic processes, evolved by natural selection to solve specific adaptive problems faced by hominids and early humans. To ensure the replication of their genetic builders, some of these automatic processes may even produce aspects of culture as extended human phenotype. Many cognitive scientists add an adapting mind to this adapted mind, a conscious analytical rule-following processor that can, on occasion, override actions planned by the automated processes. The conscious processor's main task is to adapt the general goals of genes (replicate) to the local environment in which the individual bearing those genes finds herself. To do so, the conscious processor possesses a general learning mechanism that allows it to reproduce any identifiable cultural item(from local norms to local prosody and local food preferences), a learning mechanism that also opens it to rogue cultural items: mind viruses. The nature of the cultural items being copied and of the conscious processor's copying mechanism may even be such that a whole new type of evolutionary process is going on over our minds: the evolution of cultural variants, or memes. If this is so, we, that is our conscious self, are but a battleground in which genes and memes fight for the right to activate our muscles.

[french version]

Cognitio 2009 invite les étudiants des cycles supérieurs et les jeunes
chercheurs en sciences cognitives, anthropologie, biologie,
psychologie, informatique, philosophie ou tout autre discipline
abordant la cognition, l'évolution et la culture à présenter leurs
travaux lors du colloque. Les sujets proposés sont:

  • la psychologie comparative et les cultures animales;
  • la culture et la cognition dans une perspective transculturelle;
  • la psychologie évolutionniste et l'esprit adapté;
  • la modélisation de l'évolution culturelle;
  • l'évolution et les origines du langage;
  • l'évolution de la culture et de la cognition dans la lignée humaine;
  • les questions épistémologiques liées à l'étude de la cognition, de l'évolution et de la culture.

La soumission de propositions de communication se fait à l'aide du
système EasyChair (voir http://cognitio.uqam.ca/2009). Un résumé de 600 mots doit être joint à la demande. EasyChair vous permet de joindre aussi un article en PDF si vous le désirez, mais seul votre résumé sera évalué.

La date limite pour l'envoi de résumés EST MAINTENANT LE 13 MARS.

Conférenciers invités :

Joseph Henrich
Chaire de recherche du Canada sur la culture, la cognition et l'évolution
Université de la Colombie-Britannique

Frédéric Bouchard
Département de philosophie
Université de Montréal

Thématique :

Les sciences cognitives, qui incluent maintenant des disciplines telles que la génétique cognitive, les neurosciences évolutionnistes du développement et l'anthropologie cognitive, mettent présentement de l'avant une nouvelle façon d'aborder la relation entre l'esprit et la culture. Cette nouvelle façon de voir n'est toutefois pas sans rappeler certaines conceptions de l'esprit qui prévalaient avant le 20e siècle, de Platon à Freud. Selon cette conception, une partie importante de la cognition est prise en charge par des processus inconscients qui ont évolué par sélection naturelle pour résoudre les problèmes auxquels étaient confrontés les hominidés et les premiers humains. Pour assurer la réplication de leurs véhicules génétiques, certains de ces processus pourraient même produire certains aspects de la culture, dès lors comprise comme un phénotype étendu. De nombreux chercheurs en sciences cognitives ajoutent à cet esprit adapté un esprit en adaptation : un processeur analytique conscient, capable de suivre des règles et, à l'occasion, de prendre le pas sur les actions planifiées par les processus automatiques. La principale tâche de ce processeur conscient est d'adapter l'objectif global des gènes (se reproduire) à l'environnement local dans lequel se trouve l'individu porteur de ces gènes. Pour ce faire, le processeur conscient possède un mécanisme d'apprentissage général qui lui permet de reproduire tout item culturel identifiable (qu'il s'agisse de normes, de prosodies ou de préférences alimentaires locales). Ce mécanisme d'apprentissage est toutefois vulnérable à des items culturels rebelles : les virus de l'esprit. La nature des items culturels copiés et du mécanisme de copie mise en oeuvre par le processeur conscient pourrait même mener à l'apparition dans nos esprits d'un tout nouveau type de processus évolutionniste: l'évolution de variantes culturelles, ou de mèmes. Si c'était le cas, nous (c'est-à-dire notre moi conscient) ne serions qu'un champ de bataille où gènes et mèmes s'affrontent pour déterminer qui a le droit d'activer nos muscles.

--
http://cognitio.uqam.ca/2009
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Bookmark Google Yahoo MyWeb Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Myspace Reddit Ma.gnolia Technorati Stumble Upon
 

Creative Commons License
All the content and downloads are published under Creative Commons license